BLOG:
Cal App Ct Denies Pre-Condemnation Damages
A California Court of Appeals panel recently reversed a trial court decision which was favorable to a property owner in Dep’t of Transportation v. McNamara. The issue on appeal was limited to whether the property owners were entitled to pre-condemnation damages as a matter of law. The trial court awarded the property owner pre-condemnation damages in... Read More
N.J. Supreme Court Opines on Prior Public Use Doctrine in Railroad Case
On August 6, 2013, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued its opinion in Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Intermodal Properties (available here). The Court’s opinion was limited to analysis of two narrow issues; 1) whether the proposed use is incompatible with the public interest; and 2) whether the term “exigencies of business” limited the railroad... Read More
Property Owner is Injured But Has No Remedy at Law
Berardi I (Tp of Pemberton v. Berardi, 378 N.J. Super 430 (App. Div. 2005)). On September 30, 2002, the Township of Pemberton commenced a condemnation action to acquire property owned by the Berardis within a designated redevelopment zone in the municipality. Contemporaneous with the commencement of the action, the Berardis filed an applications with the... Read More
Property Owner's Challenge to Montclair Redevelopment Plan Denied
On July 26, 2013, the Appellate Division issued an unpublished opinion in Grabowsky v Township of Montclair. In May 2012, the Township adopted an ordinance amending a redevelopment plan to permit an assisted-living facility on the Church Street site. Grabowsky filed an action challenging the ordinance adoption, which was rejected by the Law Division in... Read More
Atlantic City Revel Hotel and Casino Redevelopment Keeps Residents Moving
The Casino Reinvestment Development Authority has been slowly acquiring private property through exercise of eminent domain to “redevelop” the areas near the year-old Revel Hotel and Casino. According to a recent article by the Standard Times Go San Angelo, the redevelopment has progressed slowly because revenue from the Revel was supposed to fund a $50... Read More
Appellate Court Gives Property Owner and State Second Chance
On June 25, 2013, the a New Jersey appellate court reversed a trial court decision in State v. Shalom Money Street and remanded for trial. The primary issue on appeal was whether the Superior Court had the authority to reinstate a condemnation commissioners’ award where both parties appealed the award for a jury trial de... Read More
SCOTUS Takes Mt Holly Gardens Case!
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Mt Holly Gardens v. Mt Holly Gardens Citizens. The case background is set forth in our prior blogs, but, the property owners (through counsel South Jersey Legal Services) argue that the redevelopment of the Mount Holly Gardens violates the Constitution because the government relocation of residents... Read More
Congressional Committee Adopts Private Property Protection Act Bill
The U.S. House judiciary subcommittee on Constitution and Civil Justice recently passed a bill (H.R. 1944) that is designed to protect private property from eminent domain takings by creating a federal bar to transfers from government to private entities for economic redevelopment. The press release is available here. The bill is entitled the Private Property... Read More
Missouri Supreme Court Enforces Post-Kelo Legislation Limiting Takings for Economic Development
As reported by WatchDog.org, the Missouri Supreme Court recently rejected the Southeast Missouri Port Authority’s attempt to use eminent domain to take private property for use in connection with interstate transmission of North Dakota crude oil. (A copy of the opinion is here). The government intended to take undeveloped Mississippi River water-front property from Velma... Read More
NJ Supreme Court Hears Arguments On Dune Case
On May 13, 2013, the Supreme Court heard argument in the case of Borough of Harvey Cedars v. Karan. That case is on appeal from an Appellate Division decision, which affirmed a jury verdict awarding the property owners $375,000 as constitutional just compensation for the partial taking of their private beach-front property. The municipality appealed... Read More
